Skip to content

[2.6] MOD-9856: Check For Timeout Inside RpidxNext Loop#6306

Merged
kei-nan merged 4 commits into2.6from
backport-6298-to-2.6
Jun 15, 2025
Merged

[2.6] MOD-9856: Check For Timeout Inside RpidxNext Loop#6306
kei-nan merged 4 commits into2.6from
backport-6298-to-2.6

Conversation

@kei-nan
Copy link
Collaborator

@kei-nan kei-nan commented Jun 12, 2025

Manual backport of #6298.

* check for timeout inside rpidxNext loop

* typo

(cherry picked from commit 912f4d2)
@kei-nan kei-nan requested a review from raz-mon June 12, 2025 12:25
@kei-nan kei-nan self-assigned this Jun 12, 2025
@kei-nan kei-nan enabled auto-merge June 12, 2025 12:26
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.82%. Comparing base (8d06105) to head (64d6f07).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              2.6    #6306      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.86%   84.82%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         189      189              
  Lines       31695    31695              
==========================================
- Hits        26899    26886      -13     
- Misses       4796     4809      +13     
Flag Coverage Δ
flow 79.44% <100.00%> (-0.30%) ⬇️
unit 43.57% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kei-nan kei-nan added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 15, 2025
Merged via the queue into 2.6 with commit eb23597 Jun 15, 2025
10 checks passed
@kei-nan kei-nan deleted the backport-6298-to-2.6 branch June 15, 2025 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants