Skip to content

[2.8] MOD-9856: Check For Timeout Inside RpidxNext Loop #6305

Merged
kei-nan merged 1 commit into2.8from
backport-6298-to-2.8
Jun 15, 2025
Merged

[2.8] MOD-9856: Check For Timeout Inside RpidxNext Loop #6305
kei-nan merged 1 commit into2.8from
backport-6298-to-2.8

Conversation

@kei-nan
Copy link
Collaborator

@kei-nan kei-nan commented Jun 12, 2025

Manual backport of #6298.

* check for timeout inside rpidxNext loop

* typo

(cherry picked from commit 912f4d2)
@kei-nan kei-nan requested a review from raz-mon June 12, 2025 12:21
@kei-nan kei-nan self-assigned this Jun 12, 2025
@kei-nan kei-nan enabled auto-merge June 12, 2025 12:26
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.84%. Comparing base (30d47dc) to head (56300ac).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 2.8.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              2.8    #6305      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.85%   85.84%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         205      205              
  Lines       34667    34667              
==========================================
- Hits        29765    29761       -4     
- Misses       4902     4906       +4     
Flag Coverage Δ
flow 81.00% <100.00%> (-0.23%) ⬇️
unit 40.40% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kei-nan kei-nan added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 15, 2025
Merged via the queue into 2.8 with commit 7bd3489 Jun 15, 2025
9 checks passed
@kei-nan kei-nan deleted the backport-6298-to-2.8 branch June 15, 2025 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants