Skip to content

[8.0] [MOD-9560] Revert marking index as faulty after reaching OOM (More queries)#6277

Merged
redisearch-backport-pull-request[bot] merged 1 commit into8.0from
backport-6276-to-8.0
Jun 8, 2025
Merged

[8.0] [MOD-9560] Revert marking index as faulty after reaching OOM (More queries)#6277
redisearch-backport-pull-request[bot] merged 1 commit into8.0from
backport-6276-to-8.0

Conversation

@redisearch-backport-pull-request
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Backport of #6276 to 8.0.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.84%. Comparing base (cc160ae) to head (2b1567b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 8.0.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              8.0    #6277      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.86%   88.84%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         201      201              
  Lines       37356    37350       -6     
==========================================
- Hits        33198    33185      -13     
- Misses       4158     4165       +7     
Flag Coverage Δ
flow 83.31% <ø> (-0.14%) ⬇️
unit 42.29% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@redisearch-backport-pull-request redisearch-backport-pull-request bot added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 8, 2025
Merged via the queue into 8.0 with commit 748928c Jun 8, 2025
10 checks passed
@redisearch-backport-pull-request redisearch-backport-pull-request bot deleted the backport-6276-to-8.0 branch June 8, 2025 13:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant