Conversation
Contributor
|
Looks good to me. |
hwpang
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I got the following trace when simulating an RMG-genrated Chemkin file usng RMG's constant T/P reactor:
RMG did not read the flux pair correctly, and for some reason read the following line which was taken from a library comment.
This is the reaction it errored on:
I couldn't understand why RMG read two lines instead of one when analyzing the flux pairs. The reaction comment above can be used to debug it. As a quick patch, I'm removing the single comment from the
2003_Miller_Propargyl_Recomb_High_Pkinetic library.