Repository navigation
test(web): fix the workflow script test that times out on busy CI runners - #1801
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…ners Backport of upstream `2532e64099` (`pingdotgg#21699`), tagged in `v0.1.1-nightly.20261019.3373`; the next sync drops it. Fork-Domain: upstream-fixes Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: yes
donjor
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no Co-authored-by: donjor <[email protected]>
donjor
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no Co-authored-by: donjor <[email protected]>
donjor
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no Co-authored-by: donjor <[email protected]>
donjor
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no Co-authored-by: donjor <[email protected]>
donjor
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no Co-authored-by: donjor <[email protected]>
donjor
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no Co-authored-by: donjor <[email protected]>
donjor
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no Co-authored-by: donjor <[email protected]>
donjor
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no Co-authored-by: donjor <[email protected]>
donjor
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
donjor
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
donjor
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
donjor
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
donjor
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
donjor
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
donjor
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
donjor
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
donjor
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
2 tasks
donjor
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2026
## Problem `UsageService.test.ts` fails on every run since 2026-11-01: its fixture aged past the 92-day saved-usage retention. - **Red:** required `CI`, Test Server 2, on `hyprws` and every PR - **Also red:** the sync candidate for `v0.1.6-nightly.20261031.3956`, so the fork sync cannot land the fix itself ## Change **Exact backport** of upstream `1280ccd0d2a` (`https://github.com/pingdotgg/t3code/pull/28603`): the test pins `TestClock` near the fixture write. - **Same patch-id:** `2389d44654df` - **No upstream tag carries it yet;** the sync drops this commit once one does ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized fork CI fix, precedent #1801: an exact upstream backport that unblocks #1990 and the fork sync. Fixes #1992 ### Close conditions - [ ] `UsageService.test.ts` passes on any date - [ ] `hyprws` CI is green ## Verification - **`vp test run src/usage/UsageService.test.ts`:** 42 passed - **`pnpm run typecheck` (server):** exit 0 - **Without the fix:** fails in CI run 41297867987, Test Server 2 ## Fork trailers Fork-Domain: upstream-fixes Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: yes Co-authored-by: donjor <[email protected]>
donjor
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
rsi-software-agent Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2026
## Problem The sync to `v0.1.1-nightly.20261020.3386` fails after a clean rebase: ```text the rebased tip dropped 1 pull request link(s): #1801: cited by fe075c9 ..., by no new commit ``` #1801 backported upstream `2532e64099` exactly; both share patch-id `4221c8a56228`. The rebase drops it correctly, as its body said it would. The link guard from #1620 has no exemption for that drop, so no sync can pass. ## Change `refuseDroppedLinks` skips old commits that `git cherry <target> <old>` marks `-`, meaning the target already carries the patch. Every other dropped link still refuses. ## Scope and approval Maintainer-authorized: unblocks the requested fork sync. ## Verification | Check | Result | | --- | --- | | New test, without fix | fails | | New test, with fix | passes | | `scripts/fork-sync.test.ts` | 69 passed | | Guard on the real sync shas | passes | | `vp run fork:ci` | exit 0 | Written by Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, hosted by T3 Code. ## Fork trailers Squashes: - 68228e2 fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 3c48e3a fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - 4f2343c fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) - eb10567 fixup! fix(fork-sync): an exact upstream backport may drop its PR link (#1805) (#1805) Fork-Domain: fork-meta Fork-Tier: bugfix Fork-Upstreamable: no
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
WorkflowOpeningBlock.browser.test.tsxfails Test Web when the real Shiki load outlastsvi.waitForon busy runners.hyprwspushes: runs 39357486418, 39345341166, 39253135705Change
Backport upstream
2532e64099(#21699): the test mocks the highlighter instead of loading Shiki.It is tagged in
v0.1.1-nightly.20261019.3373, so the next sync drops this commit.Scope and approval
Maintainer-authorized fork CI fix: an exact upstream backport, unblocking the UI-consistency fix PRs.
Verification
vp test run src/components/chat/WorkflowOpeningBlock.browser.test.tsx→ exit 0vp lint <file>→ exit 0vp run fork:ci→ exit 0Fork trailers
Fork-Domain: upstream-fixes
Fork-Tier: bugfix
Fork-Upstreamable: yes