Skip to content

boards/nucleo: optimize openocd file selection#8391

Closed
haukepetersen wants to merge 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
haukepetersen:opt_boards_nucleo-openocd
Closed

boards/nucleo: optimize openocd file selection#8391
haukepetersen wants to merge 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
haukepetersen:opt_boards_nucleo-openocd

Conversation

@haukepetersen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Contribution description

This PR improves the selection of the fitting OpenOCD config file for the nucleo boards, as suggested in #8065.

Issues/PRs references

rebased on #8065

@haukepetersen haukepetersen added Type: enhancement The issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentation State: waiting for other PR State: The PR requires another PR to be merged first Area: tools Area: Supplementary tools Area: boards Area: Board ports labels Jan 22, 2018
@kaspar030 kaspar030 changed the title Opt boards nucleo openocd boards/nucleo: optimize openocd file selection Jan 22, 2018
@aabadie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

aabadie commented Feb 16, 2018

Oops I completely skipped that one when I started to work on #8475. But both are targeting the same goal.

@haukepetersen haukepetersen force-pushed the opt_boards_nucleo-openocd branch from 9bbd78d to 12c7988 Compare March 2, 2018 08:41
@haukepetersen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

rebased

@haukepetersen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@aabadie seems like your approach is going further (in the right direction), nice!

Closing this in favor of #8475.

@haukepetersen haukepetersen deleted the opt_boards_nucleo-openocd branch March 2, 2018 08:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Area: boards Area: Board ports Area: tools Area: Supplementary tools State: waiting for other PR State: The PR requires another PR to be merged first Type: enhancement The issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants