Skip to content

shell: do not advertise reactively in 6ctx command#8077

Merged
cgundogan merged 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:gnrc_netif2_integration/masterfrom
miri64:shell/fix/6ctx-no-rtr-adv
Nov 19, 2017
Merged

shell: do not advertise reactively in 6ctx command#8077
cgundogan merged 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:gnrc_netif2_integration/masterfrom
miri64:shell/fix/6ctx-no-rtr-adv

Conversation

@miri64
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@miri64 miri64 commented Nov 17, 2017

After thinking about it a bit, I decided to remove the reactive
advertisement of context information all together in the shell command.
RFC 6775 does not explicitly forbids, but it discourages multicast RAs,
which would be the alternative.

After thinking about it a bit, I decided to remove the reactive
advertisement of context information all together in the shell command.
RFC 6775 does not explicitly forbids, but it discourages multicast RAs,
which would be the alternative.
@miri64 miri64 added GNRC Area: network Area: Networking labels Nov 17, 2017
@miri64 miri64 requested a review from cgundogan November 17, 2017 15:33
@miri64 miri64 added the CI: ready for build If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR label Nov 17, 2017
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cgundogan cgundogan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, no strong opinion about that. Change is sane, though. ACK

@cgundogan cgundogan merged commit ec671c0 into RIOT-OS:gnrc_netif2_integration/master Nov 19, 2017
@miri64 miri64 deleted the shell/fix/6ctx-no-rtr-adv branch November 20, 2017 13:35
@aabadie aabadie added this to the Release 2018.01 milestone Jan 18, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Area: network Area: Networking CI: ready for build If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants