Skip to content

boards: removed support for pca1000[0|5]#7979

Merged
kaspar030 merged 4 commits intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
haukepetersen:rm_board_pca1000x
Nov 9, 2017
Merged

boards: removed support for pca1000[0|5]#7979
kaspar030 merged 4 commits intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
haukepetersen:rm_board_pca1000x

Conversation

@haukepetersen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@haukepetersen haukepetersen commented Nov 9, 2017

Both boards were early development kits by Nordic and are to my knowledge discontinued, as both have (way more affordable) successors:

  • pca10000 -> nrf51dongle
  • pca10005 -> nrf51dk

Also we don't have a pca10000 available to us anymore (went up in smoke quite a while ago), and the pca10005 is not trivial to flash (needs external jlink adapter...), so we have not tested it in probably 2 or more years. Further it seems that there are not many of these boards around in general, so I don't think someone will even notice that we drop their support...

Will provide entries to the LOSTANDFOUND.md in a separate PR.
EDIT: see #7980

@haukepetersen haukepetersen added Area: boards Area: Board ports Type: cleanup The issue proposes a clean-up / The PR cleans-up parts of the codebase / documentation CI: ready for build If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR labels Nov 9, 2017
@jnohlgard
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

👍

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jnohlgard jnohlgard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK, this should be good to go if Murdock doesn't complain about anything missing.

@haukepetersen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think I forgot to look for blacklistings throughout the tests, will do that now.

@haukepetersen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ok, good thing we talked about it :-) Removed all occurences of pca1000x from the examples and applications.

@kaspar030
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

&go.

@kaspar030 kaspar030 merged commit 39b6726 into RIOT-OS:master Nov 9, 2017
nucleo-f334 nucleo-l053 nucleo-l073 opencm904 pca10000 \
pca10005 spark-core stm32f0discovery telosb wsn430-v1_3b \
nucleo-f334 nucleo-l053 nucleo-l073 opencm904 \
spark-core stm32f0discovery telosb wsn430-v1_3b \
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line cause a merge conflict in the gnrc_netif2 integration (see #7925). Is there a way to revert this for now?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't that only relevant when you actually merge?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how about #7986

@haukepetersen haukepetersen deleted the rm_board_pca1000x branch November 9, 2017 15:33
miri64 added a commit to miri64/RIOT that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2017
As in RIOT-OS#7986 this application (obviously) causes a conflict in RIOT-OS#7925
since RIOT-OS#7979. This PR fixes that.
@aabadie aabadie added this to the Release 2018.01 milestone Jan 18, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Area: boards Area: Board ports CI: ready for build If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR Type: cleanup The issue proposes a clean-up / The PR cleans-up parts of the codebase / documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants