cc110x: port to gnrc_netif2#7414
cc110x: port to gnrc_netif2#7414miri64 merged 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:gnrc_netif2_integration/masterfrom
Conversation
666c445 to
cffa250
Compare
cffa250 to
e2190c9
Compare
|
Rebased to current master and current dependencies |
e2190c9 to
c4dea27
Compare
|
Rebased to current master, no longer waiting for other PR |
|
@kaspar030 made some comments about my usage of LOG_ERROR() in #7410. I will remove them here and in the other PRs. |
|
Anybody ever tested gnrc_cc110x successfully? |
|
When it was introduced ^^ |
|
Sure? |
|
I hope so. :D |
|
(aka no, I'm not sure) |
|
;-) |
|
I changed the base branch now to the freshly created gnrc_netif2_integration/master branch. |
8da2c4a to
37d7b50
Compare
|
Rebased to current #7925. |
b1170b7 to
52e5613
Compare
|
Rebased to current #7925 (again). |
52e5613 to
f5887c7
Compare
|
@kaspar030: ready for review. |
| #include "net/gnrc/netif2.h" | ||
| #else | ||
| #include "net/gnrc/netdev.h" | ||
| #endif |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does it still make sense here to check for netif2/netdev?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ooops, that is legacy code I still haven't removed. Fixed!
3ff2054 to
6d124d5
Compare
|
Rebased again. |
e51b0c1 to
6d124d5
Compare
b696ba6 to
ff5732a
Compare
|
Rebased and squashed to current #7925. With this PR, Murdock should now finally succeed on that branch! |
💃 |
|
needs rebase |
94177a8 to
e3ef428
Compare
|
Rebased and squashed. Thanks for the review! |
(unintrusive) port of cc110x to
gnrc_netif2Depends on #7370.This PR is part of the network layer remodelling effort:
