cpu/gpio: adapt GPIO implementations to #7173#7176
Conversation
|
@haukepetersen Tested on SAML21-XPRO, works perfectly. |
|
thanks! |
|
@haukepetersen works for the samd21 |
|
tested |
|
typo in msp430 commit message. Someone for testing on cc2538/cc2650 ? I can test next week no stm32f1 (even if I think this should be fine). |
c9231f5 to
abbc61f
Compare
|
fixed typo in commit message of |
abbc61f to
b31ee42
Compare
|
rebased. Does anyone have access to the still untested CPUs and is able to test this PR on those boards? |
b31ee42 to
34abdc8
Compare
|
rebased and confirmed working on |
| GPIO_P_TypeDef *port = _port(pin); | ||
| uint32_t pin_pos = _pin_pos(pin); | ||
|
|
||
| if (mode == GPIO_IN_PD) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the ezr32wg does not support pull-down resistors.
|
tested on remote-revb (cc2538), looks good |
|
and works with TI sensor tag (cc26x0), that's all I got for testing here 😄 |
smlng
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ACK! Based on discussion and tests, does anybody have the missing board available?
|
I do have a Z1 in the office somewhere, so I try to find it... |
0e4d8b7 to
70e17ee
Compare
|
rebased. Also verified working for the @smlng: does your ACK still hold? |
|
sure! |
|
normally Murdock should run after the reabase, shouldn't it? |
|
all green, its tested, its good?! @haukepetersen, may I push the button? |
|
yes, you may! |
Adapted effected GPIO implementations according to the discussion in #7173.
Touched CPUs (to be tested):