gnrc_netdev: port to generalized netif auto-initialization#7144
Closed
miri64 wants to merge 11 commits intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
Closed
gnrc_netdev: port to generalized netif auto-initialization#7144miri64 wants to merge 11 commits intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
miri64 wants to merge 11 commits intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
Conversation
Refine documentation
Simplify netif_type and start skeleton implementation
miri64
added
GNRC
Area: network
miri64
force-pushed
the
gnrc_netif/enh/auto_init
branch
from
cc404af to
7e9da88
Compare
Contributor
|
postponed to 2017.10 |
Member
Author
|
We are switching over to gnrc_netif2 soon, and this auto-initialization wasn't good anyway, so let's close this. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This implements the generalized auto-initialization in #6413 for GNRC and examplifies it for
at86rf2xxandnetdev_tap(other netdevs might not at the moment, I will port them if you are okay with the concept).Depends on #6413.