sys: remove config module#5756
Conversation
|
👍 for removing this, but we definitely need a replacement. |
|
I suggest a vfs or nvram based replacement. that should go in a separate PR Den 18 aug. 2016 10:46 AM skrev "Oleg Hahm" [email protected]:
|
|
Sounds a bit like overkill to me. Think of MSP430 and its INFOMEM (a small flash section, intended to store persistent device specific information). |
|
So should we close this #162 issue? |
Why would it be overkill to implement a very simple read-only vfs backend for this and make it something comparible to |
|
A whole filesystem to store some bytes in a persistent way sounds certainly like overkill to me and I don't see any benefit. |
|
@OlegHahm I didn't mean a whole file system for a config store. What I meant is that the implementation should be either an NVRAM device, or a file-like persistent memory using the VFS API. Using familiar APIs such as vfs_read/write would just make it easier to use from an application developer point of view. |
|
I guess it is worthwhile to move the discussion about what to do as a replacement to a dedicated issue. |
|
I agree, I think since this PR has been open for more than a week, I don't think anyone will mind that we remove this module until a replacement is ready. |
17aa63c to
b3a061e
Compare
|
|
ACK |
IMHO this module is unmaintained and unused... Do we still need it?