.github/labeler: recognize boards/common/native as native#21351
Merged
mguetschow merged 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom Apr 3, 2025
Merged
.github/labeler: recognize boards/common/native as native#21351mguetschow merged 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
mguetschow merged 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
the
Area: CI
mguetschow
added
CI: ready for build
crasbe
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2025
Contributor
crasbe
left a comment
crasbe
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not super familiar with the Labeler, but I guess there is only one way to find out if it applies the right labels :D
Contributor
Author
Neither am I :D Thanks anyway! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contribution description
As per the title.
Testing procedure
Look at the change, see that it's good.
Issues/PRs references
Noticed at #20023 (comment)
Fixup after #21242