drivers/nrf24l01p: model in kconfig#19650
Merged
bors[bot] merged 2 commits intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom May 24, 2023
Merged
Conversation
aabadie
added
the
CI: ready for build
aabadie
requested review from
MichelRottleuthner,
MrKevinWeiss,
fjmolinas,
jia200x,
leandrolanzieri and
smlng
as code owners
github-actions
bot
added
Area: drivers
drivers/nrf24l01p/Kconfig
Outdated
| select MODULE_PERIPH_GPIO | ||
| select MODULE_PERIPH_GPIO_IRQ | ||
| select MODULE_PERIPH_SPI | ||
| select MODULE_ZTIMER |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it is better to just select ZTIMER_USEC here. This is needed due to some circular dependencies in the modeling.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, I applied that change and it's still building fine and generated binary is the same as without kconfig.
aabadie
force-pushed
the
pr/drivers/nrf24l01p_kconfig
branch
from
ffe9400 to
4daa40d
Compare
Contributor
|
bors merge |
Contributor
|
🕐 Waiting for PR status (GitHub check) to be set, probably by CI. Bors will automatically try to run when all required PR statuses are set. |
Contributor
|
GitHub status checks took too long to complete, so bors is giving up. You can adjust bors configuration to have it wait longer if you like. |
Contributor
Author
|
bors merge |
Contributor
|
🕐 Waiting for PR status (GitHub check) to be set, probably by CI. Bors will automatically try to run when all required PR statuses are set. |
Contributor
Author
|
bors cancel |
Contributor
Author
|
bors merge |
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2023
18005: pkg/semtech-loramac: model in Kconfig r=aabadie a=aabadie 19576: boards: add stm32l496g-disco support r=aabadie a=gschorcht ### Contribution description The PR adds the board definition for the STM2L496G-DISO board. It is the same board that is also shipped with the P-L496G-CELL02 LTE pack for which we already have the board definition `p-l496g-cell02`. However, `stm32l496g-disco` provides a complete configuration of the board and supports the following features in addition to `p-l496g-cell02`: ``` > FEATURES_PROVIDED += periph_adc > FEATURES_PROVIDED += periph_dac > FEATURES_PROVIDED += periph_dma > FEATURES_PROVIDED += periph_pwm > FEATURES_PROVIDED += periph_uart_hw_fc > FEATURES_PROVIDED += arduino ``` In the long term, `p-l496g-cell02` is to be based on the new full `stm32l496g-disco` board definition. The CPT and the LCD display are not yet supported since they are connected to/controlled by the MFX (a STM32L152-based sub-system) and the FMC peripheral. ### Testing procedure All basic tests should work with the new board definition. The following tests were executed and did succeed: - [x] `tests/periph/adc` - [x] `tests/periph/dac` - [x] `tests/periph/i2c` for `I2C_DEV(0)`, `I2C_DEV(1)` is not exposed and not tested - [x] `tests/periph/pwm` - [x] `tests/periph/spi` for `SPI_DEV(0)`, `SPI_DEV(1) connection not soldered and not tested - [x] `tests/periph/timer` for `TIMER_DEV(0)` and `TIMER_DEV(1)` - [x] `tests/periph/uart` for `UART_DEV(0)`, `UART_DEV(1)` and `UART_DEV(2)` - [x] `tests/usbus_cdc_ecm` together with `stdio_cdc_acm` ### Issues/PRs references ~Depends on PR #19571~ ~Depends on PR #19572~ ~Depends on PR #19573~ 19650: drivers/nrf24l01p: model in kconfig r=aabadie a=aabadie 19660: cpu/rpx0xx: Fix kconfig model r=aabadie a=MrKevinWeiss ### Contribution description Broken master due to incorrect model of the periph_pio in kconfig. ### Testing procedure Green murdock (now that the board is added to the list) ### Issues/PRs references Look at the master CI... Co-authored-by: Alexandre Abadie <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: MrKevinWeiss <[email protected]>
Contributor
|
Build failed (retrying...): |
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2023
19576: boards: add stm32l496g-disco support r=aabadie a=gschorcht ### Contribution description The PR adds the board definition for the STM2L496G-DISO board. It is the same board that is also shipped with the P-L496G-CELL02 LTE pack for which we already have the board definition `p-l496g-cell02`. However, `stm32l496g-disco` provides a complete configuration of the board and supports the following features in addition to `p-l496g-cell02`: ``` > FEATURES_PROVIDED += periph_adc > FEATURES_PROVIDED += periph_dac > FEATURES_PROVIDED += periph_dma > FEATURES_PROVIDED += periph_pwm > FEATURES_PROVIDED += periph_uart_hw_fc > FEATURES_PROVIDED += arduino ``` In the long term, `p-l496g-cell02` is to be based on the new full `stm32l496g-disco` board definition. The CPT and the LCD display are not yet supported since they are connected to/controlled by the MFX (a STM32L152-based sub-system) and the FMC peripheral. ### Testing procedure All basic tests should work with the new board definition. The following tests were executed and did succeed: - [x] `tests/periph/adc` - [x] `tests/periph/dac` - [x] `tests/periph/i2c` for `I2C_DEV(0)`, `I2C_DEV(1)` is not exposed and not tested - [x] `tests/periph/pwm` - [x] `tests/periph/spi` for `SPI_DEV(0)`, `SPI_DEV(1) connection not soldered and not tested - [x] `tests/periph/timer` for `TIMER_DEV(0)` and `TIMER_DEV(1)` - [x] `tests/periph/uart` for `UART_DEV(0)`, `UART_DEV(1)` and `UART_DEV(2)` - [x] `tests/usbus_cdc_ecm` together with `stdio_cdc_acm` ### Issues/PRs references ~Depends on PR #19571~ ~Depends on PR #19572~ ~Depends on PR #19573~ 19650: drivers/nrf24l01p: model in kconfig r=aabadie a=aabadie 19660: cpu/rpx0xx: Fix kconfig model r=aabadie a=MrKevinWeiss ### Contribution description Broken master due to incorrect model of the periph_pio in kconfig. ### Testing procedure Green murdock (now that the board is added to the list) ### Issues/PRs references Look at the master CI... Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexandre Abadie <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: MrKevinWeiss <[email protected]>
Contributor
|
Build failed (retrying...): |
Contributor
|
Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contribution description
As the title says. Nothing special to mention, this was pretty straight forward.
Testing procedure
TEST_KCONFIG=0andTEST_KCONFIG=1oftests/drivers/nrf24l01p_lowlevelproduce the same code (tested locally and that's the case)Issues/PRs references
Ticks one item in #16875