gnrc_sixlowpan_frag_vrb: fix cppcheck warning#14683
Merged
miri64 merged 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom Aug 3, 2020
Merged
Conversation
... which wasn't a false positive after all.
miri64
added
Type: bug
miri64
requested review from
PeterKietzmann,
cgundogan and
haukepetersen
as code owners
keestux
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2020
Contributor
keestux
left a comment
keestux
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The change looks good to me
Member
Author
|
Backport provided in #14686 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contribution description
... which wasn't a false positive after all. See also #12848 (review)
Testing procedure
make -C tests/gnrc_sixlowpan_iphc_w_vrb flash testand
make -C tests/unittests tests-gnrc_sixlowpan_frag_vrb flash-only testshould still succeed for any supported board of choice.
Issues/PRs references
See #12848 (review)