gnrc_ipv6_ext: merge _handle_rh and gnrc_ipv6_ext_rh_process#10238
Merged
miri64 merged 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom Dec 18, 2018
Merged
gnrc_ipv6_ext: merge _handle_rh and gnrc_ipv6_ext_rh_process#10238miri64 merged 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
miri64 merged 1 commit intoRIOT-OS:masterfrom
Conversation
67b4249 to
b6da875
Compare
miri64
added a commit
to miri64/RIOT
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2018
b6da875 to
4d8fae8
Compare
miri64
added a commit
to miri64/RIOT
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2018
This was referenced Oct 24, 2018
013a4ce to
9e916ef
Compare
miri64
added a commit
to miri64/RIOT
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2018
9e916ef to
f9ed9d2
Compare
Member
Author
|
Rebased to current #10234 |
miri64
added a commit
to miri64/RIOT
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2018
4344794 to
49d5ce3
Compare
Member
Author
|
Rebased to current #10234. |
miri64
added a commit
to miri64/RIOT
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2018
49d5ce3 to
8e98c30
Compare
Member
Author
|
Rebased to current master and #10234. |
Member
Author
|
Oops, forgot to fetch current master ^^ |
8e98c30 to
c522dc6
Compare
miri64
added a commit
to miri64/RIOT
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2018
8bd46b3 to
b930af2
Compare
Member
Author
|
Rebased to current master. No longer dependent on other PRs. |
miri64
added a commit
to miri64/RIOT
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2018
b930af2 to
f01ab11
Compare
Member
Author
|
Rebased to current master. |
miri64
added a commit
to miri64/RIOT
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2018
5 tasks
Member
|
AFAIS the packet is being freed when it's expected. I'm OK with the code design. |
Member
... after the merge, I mean :) |
Member
|
It works as described. E.g or |
Member
|
The documentation also looks OK. |
jia200x
previously requested changes
Dec 18, 2018
f01ab11 to
5a70723
Compare
It's a lot cleaner and makes more sense if we merge those two.
5a70723 to
8701c0f
Compare
Member
Author
|
Changed @cgundogan mailing addresses as requested by him. |
Member
Author
|
(and squashed directly). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contribution description
It makes much more sense (and saves us a huge ifdef), when
_handle_rhandgnrc_ipv6_ext_rhare merged into one function.Testing procedure
I used scapy again for testing (see testing procedure in #10234).
Issues/PRs references
Depends on
#10231(merged) and#10234 (and its dependencies)(merged).