Skip to content

Conversation

@PeterL73
Copy link

@PeterL73 PeterL73 commented Oct 19, 2022

Issue being fixed #2773

Spending with sendmany and include_delegated parameter, results in JSON value is not a boolean as expected error

./pivx-cli sendmany "" "{\"<address>\":1}" 1 "" true
error code: -1
error message:
JSON value is not a boolean as expected

include_delegated is missing from vRPCConvertParams

What was done?

include_delegated was added to vRPCConvertParams

How Has This Been Tested?

./pivx-cli sendmany "" "{\"<address>\":1}" 1 "" true
<transaction hash>

The transactions got added

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have performed a test of my own code

@Liquid369
Copy link
Member

Liquid369 commented Oct 19, 2022

uTACK 2334061

Copy link

@DeanSparrow DeanSparrow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 2334061
Compiled and tested on testnet

@PeterL73
Copy link
Author

uTACK

@Liquid369 could you please update your review with the Approve option, so this PR can be merged?

@Fuzzbawls Fuzzbawls added the RPC label Oct 30, 2022
@Fuzzbawls Fuzzbawls added this to the 5.5.0 milestone Oct 30, 2022
@Fuzzbawls Fuzzbawls added the Bug label Oct 30, 2022
@Liquid369
Copy link
Member

uTACK

@Liquid369 could you please update your review with the Approve option, so this PR can be merged?

Done sorry for that

Copy link
Collaborator

@Fuzzbawls Fuzzbawls left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 2334061

@Fuzzbawls Fuzzbawls added the Needs Backport Placeholder tag for anything needing a backport to prior version branches label Nov 18, 2022
@Fuzzbawls Fuzzbawls merged commit 768dfb5 into PIVX-Project:master Nov 19, 2022
Fuzzbawls pushed a commit to Fuzzbawls/PIVX that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2022
@Fuzzbawls Fuzzbawls mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2022
@Fuzzbawls Fuzzbawls removed the Needs Backport Placeholder tag for anything needing a backport to prior version branches label Dec 11, 2022
Fuzzbawls added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2022
c0f6055 [Consensus] Bump v5.5 activation height for mainnet (Fuzzbawls)
200b908 [Consensus] Set v5.5 activation height for mainnet (Fuzzbawls)
dc31cef Add functional test for scantxoutset (PeterL73)
b452fb6 Remove commented out code (PeterL73)
3fc2e6b Backport scantxoutset and descriptors from BitCoin Core v0.17.2 (PeterL73)
8f5f52d Remove semicolon and add "verbose" back to vRPCConvertParams. (tecnovert)
ba310d1 Test for hex strings and remove stray newline from rpc_named_arguments. (tecnovert)
2b244ba Fix missing help text and add backwards compatibility. (tecnovert)
cce6951 rpc: Backport getblock verbosity (tecnovert)
fd719a2 add include_delegated to vRPCConvertParams (PeterL73)
d285af0 use block height from caller (PeterL73)

Pull request description:

  Backports the following PRs to the `5.5` branch:
  #2772
  #2774
  #2779
  #2780
  #2781
  #2784

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: b0858e8ce7a39a1a3399fb2cf3eb4c4e77ecd526d9c8ca38fab0dc1ca6d108c962a581c8e481d8ac584a35b8a88f58d9d887166a35aec8fdfb66e8d57232dfa8
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: Unable to spend Cold PIV by CLI

4 participants