Skip to content

Conversation

@random-zebra
Copy link

As discussed in #2699 , split bad-qc-quorum-hash reject reason in two different cases for "hash not found" and "hash not in active chain" and add unit test coverage.

@random-zebra random-zebra added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Jan 7, 2022
@random-zebra random-zebra self-assigned this Jan 7, 2022
Copy link

@furszy furszy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good 👍, ACK 2365261

@furszy furszy merged commit c706e29 into PIVX-Project:master Jan 13, 2022
random-zebra added a commit to random-zebra/PIVX that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2022
…ertain depth.

ee68ff1 tiertwo validation: reject qfc older than a, network specific, depth limit. (furszy)

Pull request description:

  Built on top of PIVX-Project#2713.

  Added a depth limit for the acceptance of LLMQ final commitments to prevent spam attacks like the relay of old valid qfc through the inv system.

ACKs for top commit:
  random-zebra:
    utACK ee68ff1
  Fuzzbawls:
    utACK ee68ff1

Tree-SHA512: 46b2a82f41efe72dc30b41398ca973254be2502e4d0262224d599a25db6db1042e806e79dd5412d8ba85f342a2b0c45ab120ee8b498daf7a5cd8a870c087c6f1
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants