Skip to content

Conversation

@random-zebra
Copy link

New rules shouldn't be enforced with a new block version (e.g. IsCoinbaseValueValid), because there might be blocks with that version before the relative network enforcement.
And in this case we don't need to, as the check is already contextual.

First commit removes the dependency on block version 10, and restores the default version to 9.
Second commit simply bumps back the default version to 10. This commit is meant to be backported to 5.2 in order to signal the new release.

New rules shouldn't be enforced with a new block version (e.g.
IsCoinbaseValueValid), because there might be blocks with that version
*before* the relative network enforcement.
And in this case we don't need to, as the check is already contextual.
This commit will be backported to 5.2 branch to signal the new release.
Before 6.0 there will be another block version bump in master.
@random-zebra random-zebra added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Jun 19, 2021
@random-zebra random-zebra self-assigned this Jun 19, 2021
random-zebra added a commit to random-zebra/PIVX that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2021
random-zebra added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2021
…ent)

9e29e51 [Validation] Bump default block version to 10 (no enforcement) (random-zebra)

Pull request description:

  Backports 84261bc (#2434)

ACKs for top commit:
  furszy:
    utACK 9e29e51
  Fuzzbawls:
    utACK 9e29e51

Tree-SHA512: 44b90abf9fe7f6513ca8f2ea24adbdf684f12c0ab9b57e6244519c068f7d8a76187b7a66376d4c49054ec73fcaeefba5db63aac70b26153e5fb47179f37edb5b
Copy link
Collaborator

@Fuzzbawls Fuzzbawls left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code ACK 84261bc

Copy link

@furszy furszy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 84261bc and merging..

@furszy furszy merged commit ae75b7e into PIVX-Project:master Jun 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants