Skip to content

Comments

Define DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME_TAG independently#2425

Merged
ihrasko merged 1 commit intoPANTHEONtech:mainfrom
ihrasko:actions
Oct 21, 2025
Merged

Define DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME_TAG independently#2425
ihrasko merged 1 commit intoPANTHEONtech:mainfrom
ihrasko:actions

Conversation

@ihrasko
Copy link
Collaborator

@ihrasko ihrasko commented Oct 21, 2025

Define DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME_TAG independently because GH actions are not able to make expansion from previous env defined variable.

Define DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME_TAG independently because GH actions are not
able to make expansion from previous env defined variable.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Hrasko <[email protected]>
@ihrasko ihrasko merged commit d77ec91 into PANTHEONtech:main Oct 21, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@ihrasko ihrasko deleted the actions branch October 21, 2025 11:47
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @ihrasko, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a critical issue in the GitHub Actions workflow related to environment variable expansion. By explicitly defining the DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME_TAG with its full value, it ensures that Docker images are correctly named and tagged during the publishing process, thereby preventing build failures caused by variable resolution problems.

Highlights

  • GitHub Actions Workflow Fix: The DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME_TAG variable is now defined independently within the publish-action.yml workflow. This change addresses an issue where GitHub Actions was unable to correctly expand previously defined environment variables, ensuring the Docker image name and tag are correctly constructed.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request modifies the action.yml file to define the DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME_TAG environment variable independently, addressing an issue where GitHub Actions couldn't expand it from a previously defined variable. The change hardcodes the image name and tag, which might reduce flexibility and increase the risk of inconsistencies if the image name or tag format changes in the future. I have added a review comment to address this.

DOCKER_IMAGE_TAG_LATEST: ${{ inputs.image-tag-latest }}
PUBLISH_ACCESS_KEY: ${{ inputs.publish-access-key }}
DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME_TAG: $DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME:${{ inputs.version }}
DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME_TAG: ghcr.io/pantheontech/${{ inputs.image-name }}:${{ inputs.version }}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME_TAG is now hardcoded. While this fixes the immediate issue, it reduces flexibility. Consider defining the DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME and DOCKER_IMAGE_VERSION as separate inputs and constructing the tag within the script to avoid hardcoding the registry and organization.

For example, you could define DOCKER_REGISTRY and DOCKER_ORG inputs, then construct the tag like this:

DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME_TAG=$DOCKER_REGISTRY/$DOCKER_ORG/${{ inputs.image-name }}:${{ inputs.version }}
        DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME_TAG: ${{ inputs.docker-registry }}/${{ inputs.docker-org }}/${{ inputs.image-name }}:${{ inputs.version }}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant