Resolve issues from sonarcloud marked as high severity#2350
Resolve issues from sonarcloud marked as high severity#2350ihrasko merged 2 commits intoPANTHEONtech:mainfrom
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Tobianas, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses high-severity issues identified by SonarCloud, primarily focusing on improving code clarity and resource management within the test suite. The changes involve adding explanatory comments to specific test methods and refactoring a test utility to use modern Java constructs for resource handling.
Highlights
- Test Code Clarity: Added clarifying comments to empty methods in
RncLightyModuleSmokeTest.javaand to the constructor inConverterUtilsTest.javato explain their intended behavior and address potential SonarCloud warnings. - Resource Management Improvement: Refactored
SocketAnalyzerTest.javato utilizetry-with-resourcesforServerSocketinstances, ensuring automatic and reliable resource closure and improving code robustness.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to resolve high-severity issues reported by SonarCloud. The changes include adding comments to empty methods and refactoring resource handling to use try-with-resources, which is a good practice. However, one of the changes only adds comments to a 'trust-all' TrustManager implementation without addressing the underlying security vulnerability. I have provided feedback on this critical point and also suggested a way to simplify exception handling in one of the updated test methods.
| public void checkClientTrusted(X509Certificate[] x509Certificates, String data, Socket socket) { | ||
| // Trust all client certificates | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public void checkClientTrusted(X509Certificate[] x509Certificates, String data, SSLEngine sslEngine) { | ||
| // Trust all client certificates | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public void checkClientTrusted(X509Certificate[] certs, final String authType) { | ||
| // Trust all client certificates | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public void checkServerTrusted(X509Certificate[] x509Certificates, String data, Socket socket) { | ||
| // Trust all server certificates | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public void checkServerTrusted(X509Certificate[] x509Certificates, String data, SSLEngine sslEngine) { | ||
| // Trust all server certificates | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public void checkServerTrusted(X509Certificate[] certs, final String authType) { | ||
| // Trust all server certificates | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While adding comments to these empty methods may resolve a static analysis warning about empty code blocks, it doesn't address the underlying high-severity security issue of using a TrustManager that accepts all certificates. This implementation effectively disables SSL/TLS certificate validation, which is a significant security risk. Even though this is in a test file, it's a dangerous practice that could be accidentally reused in production code. For tests, it's better to configure a trust store with the specific self-signed certificate used by the test server.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is just for testing purposes
lighty-core/lighty-common/src/test/java/io/lighty/core/common/SocketAnalyzerTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Tobianas
force-pushed
the
sonarcloud_fix
branch
from
56c3402 to
7dbb7d6
Compare
According to java:S1186: An empty method is generally considered bad practice and can lead to confusion, readability, and maintenance issues. Empty methods bring no functionality and are misleading to others as they might think the method implementation fulfills a specific and identified requirement. JIRA: LIGHTY-381 Signed-off-by: tobias.pobocik <[email protected]>
According to java:S2093: Many resources in Java need be closed after they have been used. If they are not, the garbage collector cannot reclaim the resources' memory, and they are still considered to be in use by the operating system. Such resources are considered to be leaked, which can lead to performance issues. JIRA: LIGHTY-381 Signed-off-by: tobias.pobocik <[email protected]>
Tobianas
force-pushed
the
sonarcloud_fix
branch
from
7dbb7d6 to
35070c1
Compare
2 participants
No description provided.