Skip to content

Comments

Use jetty-bom to override dependency version.#2341

Merged
ihrasko merged 1 commit intoPANTHEONtech:21.xfrom
Tobianas:21.x_jetty_bom
Sep 2, 2025
Merged

Use jetty-bom to override dependency version.#2341
ihrasko merged 1 commit intoPANTHEONtech:21.xfrom
Tobianas:21.x_jetty_bom

Conversation

@Tobianas
Copy link
Contributor

@Tobianas Tobianas commented Sep 1, 2025

Overriding only the jetty-server dependency can lead to version mismatches with other Jetty artifacts used in the project, such as http2-server, jetty-alpn-server, and jetty-alpn-java-server.

To ensure all related Jetty dependencies use the same version, it is a best practice to import the Jetty Bill of Materials (BOM). This will manage the versions for all Jetty artifacts consistently.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Tobianas, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the project's dependency management strategy for Jetty components. By adopting the Jetty Bill of Materials (BOM), it aims to standardize the versions of all Jetty-related artifacts, thereby mitigating the risk of version conflicts and ensuring greater stability and predictability in the build process.

Highlights

  • Dependency Management: The jetty-server dependency in lighty-core/dependency-versions/pom.xml has been replaced with jetty-bom (Bill of Materials).
  • Consistent Versioning: The change ensures that all related Jetty dependencies across the project will use a consistent version, preventing potential mismatches with other Jetty artifacts like http2-server or jetty-alpn-server.
  • Maven BOM Usage: The jetty-bom is imported with <type>pom</type> and <scope>import</scope>, which is the standard Maven practice for managing transitive dependency versions centrally.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly replaces a single dependency version override for jetty-server with an import of the jetty-bom. This is a best practice that ensures all Jetty-related artifacts use a consistent version, preventing potential classpath issues. The change is well-described and correctly implemented. This is a good improvement for dependency management.

Overriding only the jetty-server dependency can lead to version mismatches with
other Jetty artifacts used in the project, such as http2-server, jetty-alpn-server,
and jetty-alpn-java-server.

To ensure all related Jetty dependencies use the same version, it is a best practice
to import the Jetty Bill of Materials (BOM). This will manage the versions for all
Jetty artifacts consistently.

Signed-off-by: tobias.pobocik <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2fd5d32)
@ihrasko ihrasko merged commit 5bd1a82 into PANTHEONtech:21.x Sep 2, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants