Skip to content

Conversation

@rouault
Copy link
Member

@rouault rouault commented Jun 3, 2025

Fixes OSGeo/PROJ-CRS-Explorer#36 (comment)

During the ArcGIS Pro 3.5 database import, the import script wrongly considered the new value 'codechange' as meaning not deprecated, which resulted in deprecated CRS no longer being flagged as such.

@rouault rouault added this to the 9.7.0 milestone Jun 3, 2025
@rouault rouault added the funded through GSP Work funded through the GDAL Sponsorship Program label Jun 3, 2025
Fixes OSGeo/PROJ-CRS-Explorer#36 (comment)

During the ArcGIS Pro 3.5 database import, the import script wrongly
considered the new value 'codechange' as meaning not deprecated, which
resulted in deprecated CRS no longer being flagged as such.
@rouault rouault force-pushed the db_esri_deprecated_fix branch from 64f298b to b12746a Compare June 3, 2025 13:40
Copy link
Contributor

@jjimenezshaw jjimenezshaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What does it actually mean codechange?

This change in the database is reason for a bugfix release? (just asking)

@rouault
Copy link
Member Author

rouault commented Jun 3, 2025

What does it actually mean codechange?

My intuition is that they deprecate an old ESRI code in favor of the regular EPSG one.

This change in the database is reason for a bugfix release?

I'm not sure if the impact is that strong

@jjimenezshaw
Copy link
Contributor

This change in the database is reason for a bugfix release?

I'm not sure if the impact is that strong

I can think on this use case: If any application is showing the list of (ESRI) available CRSs, removing the deprecated ones, with PROJ 9.6.1 they will have a "few more" (hundreds?) in the combo box.
I don't know how many people is doing that with ESRI.

@kbevers any opinion?

@kbevers
Copy link
Member

kbevers commented Jun 3, 2025

@kbevers any opinion?

Well... I guess the list of CRS's in QGIS and similar apps will be longer and somewhat incorrect. It's not a problem for me personally and preparing a new release is not a priority at this time. I'm not against a quick 9.6.2 release if someone else takes the lead.

@rouault
Copy link
Member Author

rouault commented Jun 3, 2025

I'm not against a quick 9.6.2 release if someone else takes the lead.

I'll tackle a 9.6.2 release

@rouault rouault mentioned this pull request Jun 3, 2025
@melitakennedy
Copy link

melitakennedy commented Jun 3, 2025

What does it actually mean codechange?

My intuition is that they deprecate an old ESRI code in favor of the regular EPSG one.

A rarer case is when EPSG has done a deprecate/replace but Esri already had the correct definition, or the change is something that Esri doesn't support anyway.

(sorry, made 2 edits to fix my original comment made when distracted)

@rouault rouault modified the milestones: 9.7.0, 9.6.2 Jun 4, 2025
@rouault rouault merged commit 8879a1a into OSGeo:master Jun 4, 2025
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

funded through GSP Work funded through the GDAL Sponsorship Program

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants