Thank you for the contribution.
If you could just remove the "ggf.". I think the "könnte" (could) already describes the button press as optional.

What do you think about changing it to: "Bei der automatischen Öffnung wird die Tür von einer Mechanik geöffnet. Diese kann durch einen Sensor oder Taster ausgelöst werden."

What do you think about changing it to: "Bei der automatischen Öffnung wird die Tür von einer Mechanik geöffnet. Diese kann durch einen Sensor oder Taster ausgelöst werden."

That's even better 👍

That would technically not be correct for the revolving door, which does not need any trigger at all.

That would technically not be correct for the revolving door, which does not need any trigger at all.

Good point. The continuous value never felt like a good fit for a broad door question. So maybe we could have a more radical change and add extra questions for the revolving door:

1. if door=revolving we ask whether it turns automatically
2. if door=revolving && automatic_door=yes we ask whether it turns continuously, on button press or on motion sensor.

Then for every other door type (where continuously doesn't make sense) we only ask for "on button press" and "on motion sensor".
Maybe we should also rephrase the question from "is it an automatic door" to "can it be opened automatically" since some doors can be opened by button and by hand.

This has been resolved by #186