Skip to content

Null pointer exception when reading a complex type from umati server.…#2798

Merged
mregen merged 1 commit into
develop/main374from
mschier/main374npefix
Oct 14, 2024
Merged

Null pointer exception when reading a complex type from umati server.…#2798
mregen merged 1 commit into
develop/main374from
mschier/main374npefix

Conversation

@marcschier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

… the umati server has a extension object with a complex type. Type id = {nsu=http://opcfoundation.org/UA/Machinery/Result/;i=5008}. This contains something with a variant array that is null though (-1).

Proposed changes

SetProperty should support setting a Array that is null. Therefore, test for null collection (case when length was encoded as -1) before dereferencing ahead of the ToArrray() conversion to Array.

Describe the changes here to communicate to the maintainers why we should accept this pull request. If it fixes a bug or resolves a feature request, be sure to link to that issue.

Related Issues

  • Fixes #

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce?
Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR.

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Test enhancement (non-breaking change to increase test coverage)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected, requires version increase of Nuget packages)
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc.
  • I have signed the CLA.
  • I ran tests locally with my changes, all passed.
  • I fixed all failing tests in the CI pipelines.
  • I fixed all introduced issues with CodeQL and LGTM.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works and increased code coverage.
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate).
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

… the umati server has a extension object with a complex type. Type id = {nsu=http://opcfoundation.org/UA/Machinery/Result/;i=5008}.  This contains something with a variant array that is null though (-1).  SetProperty should support setting a Array that is null.  Therefore, test for null collection (case when length was encoded as -1) before dereferencing ahead of the ToArrray() conversion to Array.
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.86%. Comparing base (cb621df) to head (f31374a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop/main374.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
Stack/Opc.Ua.Core/Types/Encoders/BinaryDecoder.cs 0.00% 0 Missing and 25 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           develop/main374    #2798      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            55.31%   54.86%   -0.45%     
===================================================
  Files                  349      349              
  Lines                66056    66056              
  Branches             13549    13574      +25     
===================================================
- Hits                 36541    36244     -297     
- Misses               25631    25848     +217     
- Partials              3884     3964      +80     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mregen
mregen merged commit 3672ebe into develop/main374 Oct 14, 2024
@mregen
mregen deleted the mschier/main374npefix branch October 14, 2024 15:18
mregen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
…#2798)

The server under test has a extension object with a complex type.  Type id = {nsu=http://opcfoundation.org/UA/Machinery/Result/;i=5008}.  This contains something with a variant array that is null though (-1).  SetProperty should support setting a Array that is null.  Therefore, test for null collection (case when length was encoded as -1) before dereferencing ahead of the ToArrray() conversion to Array.
mregen added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
…#2798) (#2799)

The server under test has a extension object with a complex type.  Type id = {nsu=http://opcfoundation.org/UA/Machinery/Result/;i=5008}.  This contains something with a variant array that is null though (-1).  SetProperty should support setting a Array that is null.  Therefore, test for null collection (case when length was encoded as -1) before dereferencing ahead of the ToArrray() conversion to Array.

Co-authored-by: Marc Schier <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants