Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Builds without this just fine for me. Is there a reason this is necessary? Otherwise:
| cargoBuildFlags = [ "--locked" ]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
None that I am aware of. I just noticed the aur package had this flag.
I also managed to build and run without this flag.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thus removed the extra line.
684037a to
61b1921
Compare
|
I added a meta longDescription. |
|
I can confirm espanso packages : https://hub.espanso.org/ also work and can be installed like usual. |
cole-h
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Diff LGTM. Binary displays help. Doesn't support Wayland, so I cannot attest to its functionality.
[4 built, 2 copied (0.6 MiB), 0.1 MiB DL]
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/86495
1 package built:
espanso
|
This is working great for me. I've created a module to enable it. Once this is merged I'll open a PR for it. |
|
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: |
|
@kimat can you rebase please to fix the conflict? Also maybe update to v0.6.2. |
a16169a to
8027148
Compare
|
@bbigras I just rebased, bumped to 0.6.3 and retested the app's behaviour with |
Reviewed points
Possible improvementsComments |
|
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: |
danieldk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Added one small comment, the license does not seem accurate. Feel free to ping me once you have changed this to get it merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| license = licenses.gpl3; | |
| license = licenses.gpl3Plus; |
This should probably be gpl3Plus, since the source files have the either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version wording.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on similar PR comments, it should yes. I just updated the file accordingly.
8027148 to
6f460a7
Compare
|
@numkem are you still planning to do that module PR? |
|
@bbigras done! |
Motivation for this change
Add espanso to nixpkgs
Took this archlinux build script as reference: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=espanso
doCheck = false;? https://gist.github.com/kimat/c0b253dafef640da9cd5371af031a01dTo test this without systemd : run
./result/bin/espansothen type:espansoanywhere and that text replaces itself.Things done
sandboxinnix.confon non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"./result/bin/)nix path-info -Sbefore and after)