qscintilla: Fix qt4 build#71646
Conversation
(cherry picked from commit eb1cd0d)
after backporting from master to release-19.09
|
Running nix-review here, I see no errors and no mention of octaveHg. |
|
Oops, maybe backporting this fix wasn't even necessary. Building QGIS on the When I remove full output (click to expand)How should I handle that @lsix? I don't know how to fix it. Should I file an issue? |
|
Not that long ago (about 2 weeks I guess) I had a branch ready to backport qgis bump to release-19.09 with its dependencies. I did not push it since qscintilla-qt4 build was not merged into master yet, but it was working fine. Could #71641 solve your issue ? From a station where I cannot test the builds, it looks like it solves your problem. If not, I’ll have a look next week (I cannot do it before, I am running on a quite limited internet connection that does not allow me to download the build dependencies) |
That does indeed fix it. Thank you! |
|
EDIT: Ah nevermind. In this branch, it was already gone, it seems. |
Backport of #70391
Motivation for this change
Make applications that need qscintilla and qt4 available on release 19.09
Things done
sandboxinnix.confon non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip -s -b release-19.09"./result/bin/)nix path-info -Sbefore and after)Notify maintainers
cc @peterhoeg
nix-reviewoutputterminal output (click to expand)
questions about
nix-reviewoutputoctaveHgbroken independently? Should it be marked asbroken?warning: ignoring the user-specified setting 'sandbox', because it is a restricted setting and you are not a trusted user?