Skip to content

libsForQt5.kf5gpgmepp: drop#455601

Merged
vcunat merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
mdaniels5757:drop-libsForQt5.kf5gpgmepp
Nov 8, 2025
Merged

libsForQt5.kf5gpgmepp: drop#455601
vcunat merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
mdaniels5757:drop-libsForQt5.kf5gpgmepp

Conversation

@mdaniels5757
Copy link
Member

@mdaniels5757 mdaniels5757 commented Oct 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Unmaintained upstream since 2017. GnuPG has a maintained version of this now.

Closes: #455245
Tracking: #445447

Things done

  • Built on platform:
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Ran nixpkgs-review on this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files, usually in ./result/bin/.
  • Nixpkgs Release Notes
    • Package update: when the change is major or breaking.
  • NixOS Release Notes
    • Module addition: when adding a new NixOS module.
    • Module update: when the change is significant.
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other READMEs.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@mdaniels5757
libsForQt5.kf5gpgmepp: drop
789cb71 
Unmaintained upstream since 2017. GnuPG has a maintained version of this now.
@mdaniels5757 mdaniels5757 mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2025
Closed
13 tasks
@mdaniels5757 mdaniels5757 added the 8.has: clean-up This PR removes packages or removes other cruft label Oct 25, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Oct 25, 2025
samestep
samestep approved these changes Oct 25, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@samestep samestep left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GnuPG has a maintained version of this now.

You mentioned that that is just in the gpgme package, right?

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. label Oct 25, 2025
@iedame iedame mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2025
Open
@mdaniels5757
Copy link
Member Author

mdaniels5757 commented Oct 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Currently, yes. (On x86_64-linux, the path is /nix/store/15spfkzypaifiql0y7afppgcaxqvdrpd-gpgme-1.24.3/lib/libgpgmepp.so.) They may or may have not made some changes that may make it a non-drop-in replacement, but it's based on the same code.

The reason for the wording in the alias is because if #451898 is merged, it will no longer be bundled with gpgme, but rather broken out into https://dev.gnupg.org/source/gpgmepp/ (which is currently unpackaged).

@vcunat vcunat added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 8, 2025
Merged via the queue into NixOS:master with commit 9f341e8 Nov 8, 2025
35 of 36 checks passed
@mdaniels5757 mdaniels5757 deleted the drop-libsForQt5.kf5gpgmepp branch November 8, 2025 15:53
@dotlambda
Copy link
Member

dotlambda commented Nov 25, 2025

The reason for the wording in the alias is because if #451898 is merged, it will no longer be bundled with gpgme, but rather broken out into https://dev.gnupg.org/source/gpgmepp/ (which is currently unpackaged).

That PR now contains a commit packaging gpgmepp.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@samestep samestep samestep approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

8.has: clean-up This PR removes packages or removes other cruft 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@mdaniels5757 @dotlambda @samestep @vcunat