Conversation
f862f83 to
b572449
Compare
|
Cross‐linking #443671. (This one is presumably much easier to land.) |
arrow-cpp-19 for CMake 4.0cf0c5ae to
ebb38a0
Compare
|
|
||
| (fetchpatch2 { | ||
| name = "ceph-cmake-4.patch"; | ||
| url = "https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/ashpool/aports/-/raw/d22b70eafe33c3daabe4eea6913c5be87d9463ad/community/ceph19/cpp_redis.patch"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fetching a patch from a foreign package repository that does nothing but replace the cmake_minimum_required parameter feels odd.
|
Quick context:
Since those are static strings which are unlikely to change (since the next canonical change will probably be the removal of the files), using If Ceph 20 were to release right now it'd solve a lot of problems (Python 3.12/PyO3, CMake, also Arrow I think), but Tentacle is currently in an RC1 phase. This is not a review, just context. |
|
|
|
@vcunat what is the error you're getting? I managed to build |
|
It's some assertions in |
If you're building on That could explain why I can build it by layering the Another detail is that EDIT: I'm currently building |
|
Yes, what I tested was this PR merged to its target ( |
|
I've managed to reproduce the build failure after using OpenSSL 3.6.0 to build cryptography v40. |
|
I was trying to find out which version of cryptography fixed the issue and I narrowed it down to:
Unfortunately, bash decided to delete itself from my Nix store and now my system can't boot :) |
|
pyca/cryptography@42.0.1...42.0.4 Presumably it is pyca/cryptography#10322, as backported in pyca/cryptography@0e0e46f. Just disabling the tests seems the way to go. |
|
I fail to see why this needs to target |
|
On master this PR fixes |
it was because this was still not working without the tkinter fix , which was only available on staging-next |
|
OK. That one got to master a few minutes ago. |
Things done
arrow-cpp-19.nixwith CMake 4.0 changescpp_redismoduledoes not include #442184 (currently at
staging-next)related to #445447
passthru.tests.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage../result/bin/.Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.