julia_112{,-bin}: init at 1.12.1#450240
Conversation
4efed3e to
e91ca64
Compare
|
And also add the source version? |
That was the plan but I can't build it. Will try today again. |
fc1c8d6 to
ba1ae2d
Compare
|
my current approach fails on darwin on testing, tried to fix without success |
ba1ae2d to
9c31b2c
Compare
|
|
Probably disabling I will update to 1.12.1 then |
9c31b2c to
89ad607
Compare
|
Updated to 1.12.1, building locally now, marking ready for review |
|
I'm not able to build it on x86_64-linux: |
|
Same regression on aarch64-darwin. |
|
I am locating tests to disable, currently |
89ad607 to
1ef9f2d
Compare
1bf1948 to
69b1c3a
Compare
|
Can confirm this works on x86_64-linux now! |
pkgs/development/compilers/julia/patches/1.12/0001-skip-failing-and-flaky-tests.patch
Show resolved
Hide resolved
69b1c3a to
ed5d575
Compare
|
made upd: it didn't work for Darwin either, suggestions welcomed |
ed5d575 to
3b219e0
Compare
3b219e0 to
8c2df66
Compare
|
Ofborg failed to build due to |
thomasjm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The diff looks fine to me. I was thinking I'd start looking at julia.withPackages for 1.12 once a working 1.12 lands.
8c2df66 to
f99dc06
Compare
|
Successfully created backport PR for |
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/releases/tag/v1.12.1
Things done
passthru.tests.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage../result/bin/.Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.