Conversation
|
I've asked a review only to the |
|
According to the CMake 4 tracking issue #445447, we should only set |
cyclic-pentane
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The packages that I haven't opened PRs for yet and that still need patching are airspyhf, aptdec, cm256cc, dab_lib and mbelib.
|
Oh I missed that part, makes sense. I can do it for the remaining packages if you want. Do you suggest to open separate PRs for each package or do everything here in different commits? |
|
In one PR is okay. Could you rebase on |
2e0c1ef to
5790303
Compare
91d9783 to
697662f
Compare
|
I swear I've read
Yeah I've read that but I think I had valid reasons to directly set the cmake flag from the derivation:
For these 3 packages I may still write patches to put in nixpkgs or use |
|
|
I agree. In some cases, including this one, a simple cmake flag makes more sense. |
So 3.5 wasn't wrong, 3.10 is just more future proof and recommended. |
697662f to
b709b9d
Compare
b709b9d to
7d0808a
Compare
|
This makessdrangelbuild by adding-DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5to all the dependencies which were now now failing.See #445447, see below.
Things done
passthru.tests.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage../result/bin/.Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.