OP, note that we have local title conventions (apply for both commits and PRs). The correct format should be PROGRAM: CHANGES, if you're editing a package, or nixos/PROGRAM: CHANGES, if it's a NixOS module.

See more in the contributing docs.

May git commit --amend, git rebase -i and git push --force-with-lease be with you 🖖

This is not needed with #449283 being merged.

Hold on, the build is no longer failing, but you plan on bumping it for the future support?

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review-gha

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 449834
Commit: a4e287bd54a6e691ea52835323ff4e533331e6d9 (subsequent changes)
Merge: 01905e75e3d422fdf98e2cacc6f4a73786c7d93f

Logs: https://github.com/Sigmanificient/nixpkgs-review-gha/actions/runs/18341463901

x86_64-linux

aarch64-linux

@acid-bong done! 🙏

OP, note that we have local title conventions (apply for both commits and PRs). The correct format should be PROGRAM: CHANGES, if you're editing a package, or nixos/PROGRAM: CHANGES, if it's a NixOS module.

See more in the contributing docs.

May git commit --amend, git rebase -i and git push --force-with-lease be with you 🖖

If you have the time, you can propose an equivalent change upstream as a PR to maim. IME they are responsive and so we may be able to replace this hack by fetching a patch soon!