Skip to content

[Backport staging-25.05] llvmPackages_20: 20.1.6 -> 20.1.8#442861

Closed
nixpkgs-ci[bot] wants to merge 66 commits intorelease-25.05from
backport-414615-to-staging-25.05
Closed

[Backport staging-25.05] llvmPackages_20: 20.1.6 -> 20.1.8#442861
nixpkgs-ci[bot] wants to merge 66 commits intorelease-25.05from
backport-414615-to-staging-25.05

Conversation

@nixpkgs-ci
Copy link
Contributor

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot commented Sep 14, 2025

Bot-based backport to staging-25.05, triggered by a label in #414615.

  • Before merging, ensure that this backport is acceptable for the release.
    • Even as a non-committer, if you find that it is not acceptable, leave a comment.

vog and others added 30 commits August 18, 2025 21:18
(cherry picked from commit 0456b29)
(cherry picked from commit 802afd0)
(cherry picked from commit 5c99d67)
On machines with many build cores, the tests either fail repeatedly or
don't even manage to start because all ports are blocked. For instance,
on a heavy machine with >350 threads, valkey was busy trying to find
ports for its tests for several hours:

    [...]
    Port 23380 was already busy, trying another port...
    Port 23381 was already busy, trying another port...
    Port 23382 was already busy, trying another port...
    Port 23383 was already busy, trying another port...
    Port 23384 was already busy, trying another port...
    Port 23385 was already busy, trying another port...
    Port 23386 was already busy, trying another port...
    Port 23387 was already busy, trying another port...
    Port 23388 was already busy, trying another port...
    Port 23389 was already busy, trying another port...
    Port 23390 was already busy, trying another port...

It should be noted that the tests seem to repeatedly use the same,
smallish range given it always tried to allocate ports in the range of
233xx.

(cherry picked from commit 8e4b0ab)
(cherry picked from commit 0a1836c)
nixpkgs-ci bot and others added 23 commits September 8, 2025 00:19
systemd/systemd@v257.8...v257.9
close #439240 and #440073

Signed-off-by: misilelab <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 0e70ce7)
The source hash changes because they use `$Format:%d$` in their code,
and GitHub can substitute this with different things in different times,
see #84312.

In this case, the diff looks like this:

```
diff -ur /nix/store/v2yfg05q83i154bdi2s96g21zi079rgi-source/msgspec/_version.py /nix/store/94zddrfms1ikx61i0plxnqdd3gavfdzr-source/msgspec/_version.py
--- /nix/store/v2yfg05q83i154bdi2s96g21zi079rgi-source/msgspec/_version.py      1970-01-01 00:00:01.000000000 +0000
+++ /nix/store/94zddrfms1ikx61i0plxnqdd3gavfdzr-source/msgspec/_version.py      1970-01-01 00:00:01.000000000 +0000
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
     # setup.py/versioneer.py will grep for the variable names, so they must
     # each be defined on a line of their own. _version.py will just call
     # get_keywords().
-    git_refnames = " (HEAD -> main, tag: 0.19.0)"
+    git_refnames = " (tag: 0.19.0)"
     git_full = "dd965dce22e5278d4935bea923441ecde31b5325"
     git_date = "2024-12-27 11:06:58 -0600"
     keywords = {"refnames": git_refnames, "full": git_full, "date": git_date}
```

Fix the hash and add a comment explaining the situation.

(cherry picked from commit e72eda8)
aarch64 FMV (Function MultiVersioning) is not available before the libc
is available. This causes issues while building with compiler-rt on
aarch64. By disabling FMV before the libc is available resolves missing
symbol errors.

(cherry picked from commit ded560c)
(cherry picked from commit 86af86b)
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot mentioned this pull request Sep 14, 2025
13 tasks
@alyssais
Copy link
Member

Actually this shouldn't need to go through staging on stable.

@alyssais alyssais changed the base branch from staging-25.05 to release-25.05 September 14, 2025 09:12
@alyssais alyssais closed this Sep 14, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot reopened this Sep 14, 2025
@alyssais alyssais closed this Sep 14, 2025
@alyssais alyssais deleted the backport-414615-to-staging-25.05 branch September 14, 2025 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.