Skip to content

sourceHanPackages: move packages to toplevel only#437190

Merged
wolfgangwalther merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
jopejoe1:eval-sourceHan
Jan 21, 2026
Merged

sourceHanPackages: move packages to toplevel only#437190
wolfgangwalther merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
jopejoe1:eval-sourceHan

Conversation

@jopejoe1
Copy link
Member

Split from #434501

Things done

  • Built on platform:
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Ran nixpkgs-review on this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files, usually in ./result/bin/.
  • Nixpkgs Release Notes
    • Package update: when the change is major or breaking.
  • NixOS Release Notes
    • Module addition: when adding a new NixOS module.
    • Module update: when the change is significant.
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other READMEs.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Aug 26, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. label Aug 26, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So these packages are already built, because they are exposed as individual top-level packages below. I'm not sure why they are additionally exposed as sourceHanPackages.

There are not going to be many implications of this change. I assume that hydra has to eval a few more packages, not sure whether that is going to make any difference.

I wonder whether the sourceHanPackages is actually needed or whether we could just do:

inherit (callPackage ..) source-han-sans ...;

@emilazy WDYT?

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch and removed 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. labels Aug 26, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot removed the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Sep 1, 2025
@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther changed the title sourceHanPackages: eval and build sourceHanPackages: move packages to toplevel only Sep 4, 2025
@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

Needs treefmt.

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. label Sep 4, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Sep 17, 2025
@qweered
Copy link
Contributor

qweered commented Sep 21, 2025

Needs rebase

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons. and removed 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. labels Sep 21, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot removed the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Nov 3, 2025
@jopejoe1
Copy link
Member Author

Will self merge this tomorrow if there are no complaints.

@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 21, 2026
Merged via the queue into NixOS:master with commit af34bc6 Jan 21, 2026
29 of 31 checks passed
@jopejoe1 jopejoe1 deleted the eval-sourceHan branch January 21, 2026 19:26
@jopejoe1 jopejoe1 restored the eval-sourceHan branch January 22, 2026 06:45
@jopejoe1 jopejoe1 deleted the eval-sourceHan branch January 22, 2026 06:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants