Skip to content

OWNERS: simplify workflow/ci owners#412688

Merged
wolfgangwalther merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
wolfgangwalther:ci-workflow-ci-owners
Jun 2, 2025
Merged

OWNERS: simplify workflow/ci owners#412688
wolfgangwalther merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
wolfgangwalther:ci-workflow-ci-owners

Conversation

@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther commented May 31, 2025

The current setup causes the Security team and the other owners of .github/workflows to not be pinged for the
check-format/codeowners-v2/nixpkgs-vet workflows. This was highly likely unintended when adding those additional rules, so removing them.

Also, we have some owners looking after workflows/, but not ci/ - and some the other way around. This doesn't make much sense to me, since both parts depend on each other very much. But, I might be missing something, so maybe some of that was on purpose.

There are changes for:

Please speak up if you're not OK with these changes. Of course, you are also free to comment if you're good with them ;)

Things done


Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

The current setup causes the Security team and the other owners of
.github/workflows to **not** be pinged for the
check-format/codeowners-v2/nixpkgs-vet workflows. This was highly likely
unintended when adding those additional rules, so removing them.

Also, we have some owners looking after `workflows/`, but not `ci/` -
and some the other way around. This doesn't make much sense to me, since
both parts depend on each other very much.
@nix-owners nix-owners bot requested review from infinisil and philiptaron May 31, 2025 15:11
@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. labels May 31, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@philiptaron philiptaron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be time to found a team for Nixpkgs CI. There's definitely an ad-hoc one right now. I think that means opening an issue on https://github.com/nixos/org?

@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther merged commit 9e2e91b into NixOS:master Jun 2, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther deleted the ci-workflow-ci-owners branch June 2, 2025 07:09
@nixpkgs-ci
Copy link
Contributor

nixpkgs-ci bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Backport failed for release-24.11, because it was unable to cherry-pick the commit(s).

Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts.

git fetch origin release-24.11
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-412688-to-release-24.11 origin/release-24.11
cd .worktree/backport-412688-to-release-24.11
git switch --create backport-412688-to-release-24.11
git cherry-pick -x b98e7bb95a1e66d951a9c517cadb151694358bad

@nixpkgs-ci
Copy link
Contributor

nixpkgs-ci bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Successfully created backport PR for release-25.05:

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 8.has: port to stable This PR already has a backport to the stable release. label Jun 13, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci
Copy link
Contributor

nixpkgs-ci bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Backport failed for release-24.11, because it was unable to cherry-pick the commit(s).

Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts.

git fetch origin release-24.11
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-412688-to-release-24.11 origin/release-24.11
cd .worktree/backport-412688-to-release-24.11
git switch --create backport-412688-to-release-24.11
git cherry-pick -x b98e7bb95a1e66d951a9c517cadb151694358bad

@nixpkgs-ci
Copy link
Contributor

nixpkgs-ci bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Git push to origin failed for release-25.05 with exitcode 1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

8.has: port to stable This PR already has a backport to the stable release. 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants