treewide: migrate from pytestFlagsArray to enabledTestPaths (the trivial ones)#403112
Conversation
bdfd11c to
58d4681
Compare
58d4681 to
e5b363e
Compare
|
Rebased and resolved merge conflicts. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Only found one bad change, all others look good.
I'm not sure why you split those up in so many commits. I see no benefit for reviewing, but it must be a lot more work for you. Is that for ofborg?
Personally, I'd just create a single treewide commit, ideally with a reproducible command to run to recreate it. And then I'd run nixpkgs-review on it (ok, yeah, too many rebuilds for that, mhhh).
It was for OfBorg, git-bisect and my prior experience that splitting commits made a PR cleaner, but now a single commit seems much easier to handle considering the number of changes. |
|
Interestingly, ofborg doesn't seem to react to those changes. Does it stop doing so after a number of commits maybe (?). |
e5b363e to
cb225fe
Compare
|
The PR comments are now buried inside the commit messages. I'll merge them into one to prevent flooding. |
cb225fe to
794f904
Compare
|
Obviously, I didn't rebuild 40k packages, but the changes LGTM. Let's merge this while it's non-conflicted. |
|
Backport failed for Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts. git fetch origin staging-25.05
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-403112-to-staging-25.05 origin/staging-25.05
cd .worktree/backport-403112-to-staging-25.05
git switch --create backport-403112-to-staging-25.05
git cherry-pick -x 794f904bf3f6a985fcbd8d3a75d29ac7e84c3a50 |
This PR migrates Python packages/applications which uses
pytestFlagsArrayto hold test paths or test items toenabledTestPathsfor better__structuredAttrs = truesupport.Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.