treewide: remove obsolete aligned allocation workarounds#370749
treewide: remove obsolete aligned allocation workarounds#370749emilazy merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
Conversation
960a259 to
b0341c2
Compare
b0341c2 to
50fe44c
Compare
50fe44c to
335751d
Compare
335751d to
fc045af
Compare
|
LGTM overall, are you still searching for more occurrences or anything before marking it ready? |
|
Waiting for |
|
A rebase to latest master should clear the Eval / Tag job after #370857. I'd be interested in seeing the result for it, which maintainers are requested and which of them is failing. |
|
Will do, after I can get a |
silently skips his own, not so important, builds on the community builder... |
|
It’s the Darwin one FWIW, the Linux one is idle :) |
Yeah, I only use the darwin one, too. I build Linux stuff on my own machine. |
fc045af to
205c169
Compare
|
@wolfgangwalther This showed up quite noisily on my open tab, though refreshing seems to coalesce it:
|
Yeah, odd. I saw the same thing briefly. Odd, because I've never seen this with ofborg. But could be because we have been doing a lot more reviewer requests here (~30) at once than we ever did with ofborg, which was limited to 10. We should do something about that, discussed in #366046 (comment) |
|
FWIW I always found the “pick a ~random subset of maintainers and ping them, drop all the rest” thing somewhat dubious. (But I don’t know if I have a better concrete proposal.) |
Yeah... doing it one by one will generate that way but then GitHub cleans it up later. |
|

The first deliverable of my ~100‐commit branch cleaning up obsolete Darwin stuff. Still needs building, and a
stagingPR for the change to Node.js.Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.