Skip to content

eval/tag: remove pull request author from reviewer list#370186

Closed
Mic92 wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
Mic92:eval-tag
Closed

eval/tag: remove pull request author from reviewer list#370186
Mic92 wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
Mic92:eval-tag

Conversation

@Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented Jan 2, 2025

Things done

Untested

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@Mic92 Mic92 requested a review from infinisil January 2, 2025 10:58
@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: policy discussion Discuss policies to work in and around Nixpkgs 6.topic: continuous integration Affects continuous integration (CI) in Nixpkgs, including Ofborg and GitHub Actions labels Jan 2, 2025
@Mic92 Mic92 mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2025
7 tasks
@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Jan 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I ran the full jq (maintainers -> reviewers) command locally. Works.

Assuming that ${{ github.event.pull_request.user.login }} returns the correct value, which it should according to research, this should work in CI as well.

LGTM!

jq -r 'keys[]' comparison/maintainers.json \
| while read -r id; do gh api /user/"$id"; done \
| jq -s '{ reviewers: map(.login) }' \
| jq -s --arg author "${{ github.event.pull_request.user.login }}" '{ reviewers: map(.login) | map(select(. != $author)) }' \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can be simplified:

Suggested change
| jq -s --arg author "${{ github.event.pull_request.user.login }}" '{ reviewers: map(.login) | map(select(. != $author)) }' \
| jq -s --arg author "${{ github.event.pull_request.user.login }}" '{ reviewers: map(.login | select(. != $author)) }' \

@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. label Jan 2, 2025
@infinisil
Copy link
Member

More complete fix: #370456

@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

Superseded by #370456.

@Mic92 Mic92 deleted the eval-tag branch January 18, 2025 16:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

6.topic: continuous integration Affects continuous integration (CI) in Nixpkgs, including Ofborg and GitHub Actions 6.topic: policy discussion Discuss policies to work in and around Nixpkgs 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants