Skip to content

nixos/nixpkgs: merge lists inside config#368051

Closed
SuperSandro2000 wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
SuperSandro2000:356739
Closed

nixos/nixpkgs: merge lists inside config#368051
SuperSandro2000 wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
SuperSandro2000:356739

Conversation

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 commented Dec 25, 2024

eg permittedInsecurePackages

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` labels Dec 25, 2024
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 marked this pull request as ready for review December 25, 2024 02:39
eg permittedInsecurePackages
@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Dec 25, 2024
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

@Atemu
Copy link
Member

Atemu commented Jan 12, 2025

It's entirely unclear of how this code works or how this fixes the issue. Please explain and/or refactor.

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md labels Jul 5, 2025
@sokai
Copy link

sokai commented Nov 20, 2025

Hey! On my road to find a solution to the current situation I stumbled over PR #396595 and this issue …
It seems to me both PRs try to solve a similar thing?
JFYI + KR

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Nov 20, 2025
@dwt
Copy link
Contributor

dwt commented Dec 23, 2025

@SuperSandro2000 I did try to write some unit tests for this functionality and found it surprisingly hard. I would love for us to combine efforts and I do not really care what the resulting attribute is called.

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Jan 31, 2026
@jopejoe1
Copy link
Member

This would also be fixed by #489889

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 deleted the 356739 branch March 1, 2026 02:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants