Skip to content

linuxPackages.cryptodev: 1.13 -> 1.14#359871

Merged
SuperSandro2000 merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
blitz:cryptodev
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

linuxPackages.cryptodev: 1.13 -> 1.14#359871
SuperSandro2000 merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
blitz:cryptodev

Conversation

@blitz
Copy link
Contributor

@blitz blitz commented Nov 28, 2024

Things done

Update cryptodev to latest version to fix build failure for Linux 5.10.

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@blitz
Copy link
Contributor Author

blitz commented Nov 28, 2024

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 359871 --checkout commit


x86_64-linux

⏩ 1 package marked as broken and skipped:
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_4_hardened.cryptodev
❌ 1 package failed to build:
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_latest_libre.cryptodev
✅ 17 packages built:
  • cryptodev (linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_6.cryptodev)
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_10.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_10_hardened.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_15.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_15_hardened.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_4.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_1.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_11.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_11_hardened.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_12.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_1_hardened.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_hardened.cryptodev (linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_6_hardened.cryptodev)
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_libre.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_lqx.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_xanmod.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_xanmod_latest.cryptodev (linuxKernel.packages.linux_xanmod_stable.cryptodev)
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_zen.cryptodev

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from moni-dz November 29, 2024 06:50
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100 This PR causes between 11 and 100 packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Nov 29, 2024
@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. label Nov 29, 2024
@moni-dz moni-dz added 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons. 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in any of the changed packages. and removed 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. labels Nov 29, 2024
@blitz
Copy link
Contributor Author

blitz commented Nov 29, 2024

The linuxKernel.packages.linux_latest_libre.cryptodev failure is unrelated. linuxKernel.kernels.linux_latest_libre is currently b0rken. See #359464.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
pname = "cryptodev-linux-1.14";
pname = "cryptodev-linux";
version = "1.14";

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SuperSandro2000 Thanks for the review! I've removed the code that appended the kernel version to the derivation name and applied the remaining fixes you suggested. Now it mostly does what other out-of-tree modules do as well.

@blitz
Copy link
Contributor Author

blitz commented Dec 4, 2024

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 359871 --checkout commit run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package marked as broken and skipped:
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_4_hardened.cryptodev
18 packages built:
  • cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_10.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_10_hardened.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_15.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_15_hardened.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_4.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_1.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_11.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_11_hardened.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_12.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_1_hardened.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_hardened.cryptodev (linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_6_hardened.cryptodev)
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_latest_libre.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_libre.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_lqx.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_xanmod.cryptodev
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_xanmod_latest.cryptodev (linuxKernel.packages.linux_xanmod_stable.cryptodev)
  • linuxKernel.packages.linux_zen.cryptodev

@wegank wegank removed 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons. 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in any of the changed packages. labels Dec 5, 2024
@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from moni-dz December 5, 2024 16:41
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 merged commit cd3cc40 into NixOS:master Dec 18, 2024
@blitz blitz deleted the cryptodev branch December 19, 2024 21:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100 This PR causes between 11 and 100 packages to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants