ch9344: 2.0 -> 0-unstable-2024-11-15#354536
Conversation
|
Can someone explain to me why the bot failed? Was it because of my PR? |
|
@ofborg build ch9344 ofborg sometimes fails, it has nothing to do with your PR in particular. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please replace with an archived URL
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Currently tracking WCH's GitHub instead. Unfortunately, as the versioning is a mess (mentioned in the commit message), package is now treated as having no upstream versioning.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I also independently figured out that their Github is a better source than their release zips. The URL for the release zips stays the same but the content is updated when they have a new release.
43240c1 to
31079e2
Compare
31079e2 to
89d55f6
Compare
4a7edcd to
c65bb27
Compare
blitz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great! It would be really great to merge this because it spams nixpkgs-review. :)
GitHub repository does not contain versioned tags. The version mentioned in the commit message also does not match the change log embedded in the source code, which seems to be where the official version came from. Since this is such a mess, treat the package as no versioning.
345f0e6 to
c353ff9
Compare
|
@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge |
|
@MakiseKurisu merge not permitted (#305350): |
Updated to v2.1, which was released on 2024-10-26.
Changelog from the driver source code:
Update 1: Package is now tracking WCH's GitHub repository, which is more stable.
Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.