Skip to content

openjfx11: drop#347149

Merged
thiagokokada merged 3 commits intoNixOS:masterfrom
emilazy:push-vonqyqkkqwyo
Oct 7, 2024
Merged

openjfx11: drop#347149
thiagokokada merged 3 commits intoNixOS:masterfrom
emilazy:push-vonqyqkkqwyo

Conversation

@emilazy
Copy link
Member

@emilazy emilazy commented Oct 7, 2024

OpenJFX 11 reached end‐of‐life in 2023.

cc @emmanuelrosa – sorry about the casualty here, but we can’t ship an unsupported multimedia framework that vendors a year+ old copy of a browser engine, especially in security‐critical contexts :) Maybe you’d be interested in reviving #318594 now that the error message for the formatting check has been improved?

Result of nixpkgs-review run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package marked as broken and skipped:
  • bisq-desktop

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

OpenJFX 11 has been EOL for over a year; upstream
uses OpenJFX 15 which is also EOL. According
to <bisq-network/bisq#6758>, the
application does not function with later versions, and has a
limited remaining lifespan as there is a new major version that
uses more modern versions. It looks like that version officially
supports OpenJDK 22, which is also EOL, but hopefully it will
work with 21 or 23. Some work was done already to package it here:
<NixOS#318594>.
The derivation doesn’t support Darwin anyway, and OpenJFX 11 is EOL.
@emilazy emilazy added 1.severity: security Issues which raise a security issue, or PRs that fix one 6.topic: java Including JDK, tooling, other languages, other VMs labels Oct 7, 2024
@emilazy emilazy requested a review from thiagokokada October 7, 2024 19:16
OpenJFX 11 reached end‐of‐life in 2023.
@emilazy emilazy force-pushed the push-vonqyqkkqwyo branch from 40f5974 to c979637 Compare October 7, 2024 19:23
@emmanuelrosa emmanuelrosa mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2024
13 tasks
@emmanuelrosa
Copy link
Contributor

I just made another attempt at contributing Bisq 2, but the damn formatter is still getting in the way. #347160

@ofborg ofborg bot added the 8.has: clean-up This PR removes packages or removes other cruft label Oct 7, 2024
@ofborg ofborg bot requested review from emmanuelrosa and oneingan October 7, 2024 20:25
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux. labels Oct 7, 2024
@thiagokokada thiagokokada merged commit 7b588db into NixOS:master Oct 7, 2024
@thiagokokada
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the great work in those JDK/JFX cleanups @emilazy.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Backport failed for release-24.05, because it was unable to cherry-pick the commit(s).

Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts.

git fetch origin release-24.05
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-347149-to-release-24.05 origin/release-24.05
cd .worktree/backport-347149-to-release-24.05
git switch --create backport-347149-to-release-24.05
git cherry-pick -x 9d3560b6eb2a8e23b78f80460d5f58d5f7b4f4a4 3ec78d411851ad1d2320e6c43c56595e752f0ba5 c979637f24641155d8d30511358e73483a3335c4

@emilazy emilazy deleted the push-vonqyqkkqwyo branch October 7, 2024 21:21
@emilazy
Copy link
Member Author

emilazy commented Oct 7, 2024

I’ll do a manual backport later.

Thanks for the great work in those JDK/JFX cleanups @emilazy.

I’m currently in the process of deduplicating the OpenJDK/OpenJFX expressions across versions, which is leading to some very interesting revelations about what all that copy‐pasting led to :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

1.severity: security Issues which raise a security issue, or PRs that fix one 6.topic: java Including JDK, tooling, other languages, other VMs 8.has: clean-up This PR removes packages or removes other cruft 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants