libblockdev: 3.0.4 -> 3.1.1#298172
Merged
wegank merged 1 commit intoNixOS:staging-nextfrom Mar 30, 2024
Merged
Conversation
ofborg
bot
added
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10
r-ryantm
force-pushed
the
auto-update/libblockdev
branch
from
c76befe to
3030b58
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/project/libblockdev/versions. meta.description for libblockdev is: A library for manipulating block devices meta.homepage for libblockdev is: http://storaged.org/libblockdev/ meta.changelog for libblockdev is: https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/raw/3.1.1-1/NEWS.rst Updates performed
To inspect upstream changesImpactChecks done
Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)Instructions to test this update (click to expand)Either download from Cachix: (The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.) Or, build yourself: Or: After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries: Pre-merge build resultsWe have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages. Result of 7 packages marked as broken and skipped:
166 packages built:
Maintainer pingscc @JohnAZoidberg for testing. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/project/libblockdev/versions.
meta.description for libblockdev is: A library for manipulating block devices
meta.homepage for libblockdev is: http://storaged.org/libblockdev/
meta.changelog for libblockdev is: https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/raw/3.1.0-1/NEWS.rst
Updates performed
To inspect upstream changes
Release on GitHub
Compare changes on GitHub
Impact
Checks done
passthru.tests, if any, passedRebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)
Either download from Cachix:
(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the
trusted-userslist or you can usesudosince root is effectively trusted.Or, build yourself:
Or:
After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:
Pre-merge build results
We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.
This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.
Result of
nixpkgs-review --extra-nixpkgs-config '{ allowInsecurePredicate = x: true; }'run on x86_64-linux 17 packages marked as broken and skipped:
165 packages built:
Maintainer pings
cc @JohnAZoidberg for testing.