Skip to content

Comments

[23.11] top-level: use callPackages where inheriting packages#297051

Merged
lilyinstarlight merged 1 commit intoNixOS:release-23.11from
RaitoBezarius:backport-282015-to-release-23.11
Mar 18, 2024
Merged

[23.11] top-level: use callPackages where inheriting packages#297051
lilyinstarlight merged 1 commit intoNixOS:release-23.11from
RaitoBezarius:backport-282015-to-release-23.11

Conversation

@RaitoBezarius
Copy link
Member

@RaitoBezarius RaitoBezarius commented Mar 18, 2024

Description of changes

(cherry picked from commit a276e8b)

This is, to me, a critical bugfix because some packages are expected to be overrideable...

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

 otherwise those packages cannot be overriden

 Resubmition because of revert in NixOS#281932

(cherry picked from commit a276e8b)
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Mar 18, 2024
@lilyinstarlight lilyinstarlight merged commit 74425b6 into NixOS:release-23.11 Mar 18, 2024
@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Did you check if the internals of those packages are similar to unstable? If a package got refactored in the meantime, this could cause regressions and the initial PR had some oversights already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants