@globin, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @edolstra, @bennofs and @edwtjo to be potential reviewers.

Mostly okay (err, actually really happy) with this, but I might leave the parameter in place and add an assertion that it's empty, so we can throw a helpful error message ("we've removed md5 support from nixpkgs; please use sha256 from now on" or something) for a while, instead of just breaking it. Nix packages do exist outside of nixpkgs and I hate breaking things with no helpful errors.

@copumpkin updated

Awesome, thanks!!