Skip to content

pgjwt: init at 0.0.1#22644

Merged
fpletz merged 2 commits intoNixOS:masterfrom
spinus:pgjwt
Feb 26, 2017
Merged

pgjwt: init at 0.0.1#22644
fpletz merged 2 commits intoNixOS:masterfrom
spinus:pgjwt

Conversation

@spinus
Copy link
Member

@spinus spinus commented Feb 11, 2017

Motivation for this change

Needed JWT token manipulation inside PostgreSQL (easier work with PostgREST).

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing
    (nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
    or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf
    on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • Linux
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@spinus, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @edolstra, @aszlig and @peti to be potential reviewers.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: please add some whitespace after the first and before the last brace in the
parameter list and around = in the name and version attributes below.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wish we have formatting tool :-) I'll fix

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this rely on submodules? If not, consider using a source archive, e.g., via fetchFromGitHub.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nope, just simple repo.
Sure, I can change that. Does fetchFromGitHub has any advantage over that?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@spinus yes, it's more bandwidth efficient and supports caching.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Using source archive that is, fetchFromGitHub is just a convenient way of doing it).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@vrthra vrthra added 0.kind: enhancement Add something new or improve an existing system. 8.has: package (update) This PR updates a package to a newer version 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package and removed 8.has: package (update) This PR updates a package to a newer version labels Feb 11, 2017
@spinus
Copy link
Member Author

spinus commented Feb 21, 2017

@joachifm I fixed some stuff you mentioned. If you find a moment, please let me know if that is ok now.

@fpletz fpletz merged commit 0b27c74 into NixOS:master Feb 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

0.kind: enhancement Add something new or improve an existing system. 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants