Conversation
|
LGTM, but the aarch64-linux builds are failing because of arrow's cxx17 requirement. |
|
I propose we mark aarch64-linux as broken until that is sorted out. (#209870 and a follow up bump of the default gcc, I think.) |
|
I recommend to rebase onto master (with a few conflicts) before running |
|
This should be rebased on master. |
|
Result of 24 packages marked as broken and skipped:
89 packages failed to build:
|
Also: Fix CMake `find_package(thrift)` by installing the required `FindLibevent.cmake` module.
|
^ failed on python3.10-cffi |
4a4d948 to
6c43205
Compare
Rebased and retargeted now.
Can you try again? |
That won't work until #214010 lands on master. |
|
@veprbl Would you please test if the standard workaround of using |
This looks like quite a rabithole. Are you a user of arrow-cpp on aarch64? |
I'm maintaining |
|
|
Should we do this in general, only for the affected platform, or is it a bad idea? |
There are over 20 packages that depend directly on |
Let's check how many of those are not optional first. |
|
@GrahamcOfBorg build python3Packages.pyvista |
b918cc2 to
7f727d8
Compare
|
@GrahamcOfBorg build python3Packages.pyvista |
7f727d8 to
3824c54
Compare
|
@GrahamcOfBorg build python3Packages.pyvista |
|
I learned that arrow gained support for system jemalloc in apache/arrow#13373. Should we switch to that in this PR still? |
|
@tobim Let's follow up in another PR. |
Description of changes
Based on #198805. Fixed the merge conflicts and did another bump to 11.
Things done
sandbox = trueset innix.conf? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.shto update generated release notesCloses: #198805