Skip to content

Comments

staging-next 2022-04-23#169965

Closed
vcunat wants to merge 146 commits intomasterfrom
staging-next
Closed

staging-next 2022-04-23#169965
vcunat wants to merge 146 commits intomasterfrom
staging-next

Conversation

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

@vcunat vcunat commented Apr 23, 2022

r-ryantm and others added 30 commits February 11, 2022 16:56
lapack-reference: 3.10.0 -> 3.10.1
glibc already has to be careful not to create extra dynamic relocations
in ld.so. For that it enables -fPIC/-fPIE selectively.
Fixes a traceback where you get the following error:
- AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_command'

This happened when cross-compiling e.g. harfbuzz.
@ofborg ofborg bot added the ofborg-internal-error Ofborg encountered an error label Apr 30, 2022
@Madouura
Copy link
Contributor

Madouura commented May 1, 2022

Would like to see these merged into master as part of this.

This was referenced May 1, 2022
@NickCao
Copy link
Member

NickCao commented May 1, 2022

Would like to see these merged into master as part of this.

* [gcc: 11.2.0 -> 11.3.0 #170121](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/170121)

We are too late for the party, just wait for the next staging-next cycle!

@vcunat
Copy link
Member Author

vcunat commented May 1, 2022

Yes. Actually, for the stuff built on Hydra as part of this iteration, also the systemd rebuild is missing (77a189e).

It was merged much later than expected, so I deferred it to the next one. As I didn't want to juggle reverts, I pointed Hydra to a new branch before that merge (staging-next-2022-04-23). I thought it would be very fast, but unfortunately Hydra's speed for aarch64-linux is a fraction of the usual, and moreover the whole farm was out for a day or two.

@vcunat vcunat closed this in 9478ec7 May 2, 2022
@vcunat
Copy link
Member Author

vcunat commented May 2, 2022

To be clear, this was merged... basically. That systemd change is missing in this iteration.

@cole-h cole-h removed the ofborg-internal-error Ofborg encountered an error label May 3, 2022
@vcunat vcunat mentioned this pull request May 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

6.topic: fetch Fetchers (e.g. fetchgit, fetchsvn, ...) 6.topic: kernel The Linux kernel 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 6.topic: python Python is a high-level, general-purpose programming language. 6.topic: qt/kde Object-oriented framework for GUI creation 6.topic: systemd Software suite that provides an array of system components for Linux operating systems. 8.has: changelog This PR adds or changes release notes 8.has: clean-up This PR removes packages or removes other cruft 8.has: documentation This PR adds or changes documentation 10.rebuild-darwin: 501+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Darwin and should normally target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-darwin: 5001+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Darwin and must target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-darwin-stdenv This PR causes stdenv to rebuild on Darwin and must target a staging branch. 10.rebuild-linux: 501+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Linux and should normally target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-linux: 5001+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Linux and must target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-linux-stdenv This PR causes stdenv to rebuild on Linux and must target a staging branch.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.