toplevel: stdenv.lib -> lib#108934
Conversation
alyssais
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM as long as OfBorg identifies it as rebuild-0.
|
Should such a change be done treewide whenever you get the chance to? |
|
Are we in any way fixing anything by this or will this just cause work for people that have expressions relying on this? |
How do you mean expressions relying on this? |
Nevermind, I thought the change in |
|
Doesn't eval. Fix: Profpatsch#3 With that patch, nixpkgs-review says it doesn't change anything. |
The end goal is to completely remove |
I’m not sure we necessarily want to completely remove it, because there’ll be lots of external code that uses it. But we don’t want to be using it within Nixpkgs. |
|
yeah, just not use it, maybe add a warning eventually, but that’s far out. If we give people less examples, they won’t copy it around so much. |
|
@GrahamcOfBorg build dotnetPackages emscriptenPackages haxePackages luaPackages pythonPackages |
The library does not depend on stdenv, that `stdenv` exposes `lib` is an artifact of the ancient origins of nixpkgs.
f98b097 to
86b122c
Compare
The library does not depend on stdenv, that
stdenvexposeslibisan artifact of the ancient origins of nixpkgs.
Motivation for this change
Things done
sandboxinnix.confon non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"./result/bin/)nix path-info -Sbefore and after)