-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.1k
Closed
Labels
0.kind: questionRequests for a specific question to be answeredRequests for a specific question to be answered6.topic: haskellGeneral-purpose, statically typed, purely functional programming languageGeneral-purpose, statically typed, purely functional programming language6.topic: policy discussionDiscuss policies to work in and around NixpkgsDiscuss policies to work in and around Nixpkgs
Description
For the discussion that led to this, see #354270.
I think an uncontroversial way forward would be to do the following going forward:
- Base
haskell-updatesPRs onmasterfor fast testing on Hydra. - Merge
haskell-updatesintostagingas a general rule. Whenstaging-nextis in an early phase we can consider merging it intostaging-nexton a case per case basis.
Outstanding tasks to make this happen (not sure if this is exhaustive?!):
- Finish haskellPackages: update stackage and hackage #354270 and the following
staging-nextrotation. Unfortunately, the PR is currently based onstaging. - Update the maintainer documentation, i.e.
HACKING.md. - Update the
merge-and-open-pr.shmaintainer script - Update
periodic-merge-24h.ymlto merge the merge base ofstagingandmasterintohaskell-updatesto preventhaskell-updatesfrom being ahead ofstaging. This should be possible with GitHub action's outputs from jobs, but I don't know how it'd precisely work.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
0.kind: questionRequests for a specific question to be answeredRequests for a specific question to be answered6.topic: haskellGeneral-purpose, statically typed, purely functional programming languageGeneral-purpose, statically typed, purely functional programming language6.topic: policy discussionDiscuss policies to work in and around NixpkgsDiscuss policies to work in and around Nixpkgs
Projects
Status
Done